Litigation and Settlement in a Game with Incomplete Information / Najlacnejšie knihy
Litigation and Settlement in a Game with Incomplete Information

Kod: 06809494

Litigation and Settlement in a Game with Incomplete Information

Autor Wolfgang Ryll

We investigate a two-person game of litigation and settlement with incomplete information on one side. So far, various theoretical attempts have been made to answer the question of why some people choose not to resolve their dispu ... więcej

61.28


Dostępna u dostawcy w małych ilościach
Wysyłamy za 13 - 16 dni

Potrzebujesz więcej egzemplarzy?Jeżeli jesteś zainteresowany zakupem większej ilości egzemplarzy, skontaktuj się z nami, aby sprawdzić ich dostępność.


Dodaj do schowka

Zobacz książki o podobnej tematyce

Podaruj tę książkę jeszcze dziś
  1. Zamów książkę i wybierz "Wyślij jako prezent".
  2. Natychmiast wyślemy Ci bon podarunkowy, który możesz przekazać adresatowi prezentu.
  3. Książka zostanie wysłana do adresata, a Ty o nic nie musisz się martwić.

Dowiedz się więcej

Więcej informacji o Litigation and Settlement in a Game with Incomplete Information

Za ten zakup dostaniesz 154 punkty

Opis

We investigate a two-person game of litigation and settlement with incomplete information on one side. So far, various theoretical attempts have been made to answer the question of why some people choose not to resolve their disputes and instead go to court and incur litigation costs, even if bargaining leaves room for both parties to fare better when avoiding the conflict. We can distinguish between games which focus on strategic elements like games with incomplete information (see, for example, P'ng (1983), Samuelson (1982) and Schweizer (1989" and decision-theoretic models neglecting strategic elements (see, for example, Landes (1971) and Gould (1973". The single-person decision theory approach to litigation assumes litigants to have a subjective estimate of the likelihood that the plaintiff will win the action. Differing views on the probability of winning the court case help to explain the fraction of cases that actually go to trial. Among others, P'ng (1983) points out the shortcomings of the single-person decision theory approach which does not take into account, for example, the different fee systems in England and the U.S. and the differences in information conflicting parties may have. P'ng constructs a model of one-sided incomplete information where the settlement terms are given exogenously. Schweizer (1989), on the other hand, extends P'ng's model and allows for two-sided asymmetric information where the settlement terms are determined endogenously.

Szczegóły książki

Kategoria Książki po angielsku Mathematics & science Mathematics Applied mathematics

61.28

Ulubione w innej kategorii



Osobní odběr Bratislava a 2642 dalších

Copyright ©2008-24 najlacnejsie-knihy.sk Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżonePrywatnieCookies


Konto: Logowanie
Všetky knihy sveta na jednom mieste. Navyše za skvelé ceny.

Nákupní košík ( prázdný )

Nakupte za 59,99 € a
máte doručení zdarma.

Twoja lokalizacja: