Invented Case - Bovine Co v Slurry Co - Law Coursework - Consultation Essay / Najlacnejšie knihy
Invented Case - Bovine Co v Slurry Co - Law Coursework - Consultation Essay

Code: 01605137

Invented Case - Bovine Co v Slurry Co - Law Coursework - Consultation Essay

by Daniel Döring

Scholarly Research Paper from the year 2006 in the subject Law - Miscellaneous, printed single-sided, grade: 1,2, The University of Sydney, 3 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: 1. On Wednesday Bovine Co, a d ... more

15.56

RRP: 17.23 €

You save 1.67 €


In stock at our supplier
Shipping in 8 - 10 days
Add to wishlist

You might also like

Give this book as a present today
  1. Order book and choose Gift Order.
  2. We will send you book gift voucher at once. You can give it out to anyone.
  3. Book will be send to donee, nothing more to care about.

Book gift voucher sampleRead more

More about Invented Case - Bovine Co v Slurry Co - Law Coursework - Consultation Essay

You get 39 loyalty points

Book synopsis

Scholarly Research Paper from the year 2006 in the subject Law - Miscellaneous, printed single-sided, grade: 1,2, The University of Sydney, 3 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: 1. On Wednesday Bovine Co, a dairy farmer, visits Slurry Co, agricultural merchants in Warwickshire and agrees to buy 30 tons of Nitrogrow fertiliser (all Fred has in stock), 300 gallons of diesel oil and a John D tractor of which Slurry Co has several in his showroom. Bovine Co agrees to deliver the fertiliser and the tractor the following Friday and Bovine Co agrees to send a road tanker to collect the diesel oil the same day. Slurry Co agrees to give Bovine Co 28 days credit from the date of the sale in respect of the purchase price of all three items.On Thursday, Slurry Co discovers that 20 tons of the fertiliser have been stolen from his premises and it is impossible to obtain further supplies this season. Slurry Co delivers the remaining ten tons, but Bovine Co refuses to accept them. Bovine Co does not send a tanker to collect the diesel oil, which is in a tank containing 1,000 gallons, until two weeks after the date stipulated in the contract. He then finds that the oil has seriously deteriorated and he refuses to accept it.On Friday, Slurry Co puts the tractor on one of his own lorries for delivery to Bovine Co, but on the way the lorry is involved in a serious accident and the tractor is badly damaged.Slurry Co claims that Bovine Co is bound to pay for the oil and the tractor and to pay damages for non-acceptance of the fertiliser.Advise Bovine Co.In order to be able to refute the claims of Slurry Co, it is important to understand with whom the Property of the various goods laid at the time of the various incidents. Property is defined as the absolute legal interest in the goods (Sealy & Hooley, 2005, p. 254) and is indelibly linked to the concept of risk. Under various sections of the Sale of Goods Act, mention is given to the risk passing to the buyer. In this case, the risk is considered to be the chance that the goods may be wholly or partly destroyed or lost by theft. It should be noted that in this context, risk is not attributable to fault or inaction of either of the parties to the contract. In order to provide a clear path through the relevant sections of law, each item in the contract has been dealt with as a separate entity for analysis.

Book details

Book category Books in English Law Jurisprudence & general issues

15.56

Trending among others



Collection points Bratislava a 2642 dalších

Copyright ©2008-24 najlacnejsie-knihy.sk All rights reservedPrivacyCookies


Account: Log in
Všetky knihy sveta na jednom mieste. Navyše za skvelé ceny.

Shopping cart ( Empty )

For free shipping
shop for 59,99 € and more

You are here: