International Finance Discussion Papers / Najlacnejšie knihy
International Finance Discussion Papers

Code: 08275503

International Finance Discussion Papers

by David Bowman

Prior to the recent financial crisis, one of the most prominent examples of unconventional monetary stimulus was Japan's "quantitative easing policy" (QEP). Most analysts agree that QEP did not succeed in stimulating aggregate dem ... more

17.26


In stock at our supplier
Shipping in 15 - 20 days
Add to wishlist

You might also like

Give this book as a present today
  1. Order book and choose Gift Order.
  2. We will send you book gift voucher at once. You can give it out to anyone.
  3. Book will be send to donee, nothing more to care about.

Book gift voucher sampleRead more

More about International Finance Discussion Papers

You get 43 loyalty points

Book synopsis

Prior to the recent financial crisis, one of the most prominent examples of unconventional monetary stimulus was Japan's "quantitative easing policy" (QEP). Most analysts agree that QEP did not succeed in stimulating aggregate demand sufficiently to overcome persistent deflation. However, it remains unclear whether QEP simply provided little stimulus, or whether its positive effects were overwhelmed by the contractionary forces in Japan's post-bubble economy. In the spirit of Kashyap and Stein (2000) and Hosono (2006), this paper uses bank-level data from 2000 to 2009 to examine the effectiveness in promoting bank lending of a key element of QEP, the Bank of Japan's injections of liquidity into the interbank market. We identify a robust, positive, and statistically significant effect of bank liquidity positions on lending, suggesting that the expansion of reserves associated with QEP likely boosted the flow of credit. However, the overall size of that boost was probably quite small. First, the estimated response of lending to liquidity positions in our regressions is small. Second, much of the effect of the BOJ's reserve injections on bank liquidity was offset as banks reduced their lending to each other. Finally, the effect of liquidity on lending appears to have held only during the initial years of QEP, when the banking system was at its weakest; by 2005, even before QEP was abandoned, the relationship between liquidity and lending had evaporated.

Book details

Book category Books in English Society & social sciences Politics & government

17.26

Trending among others



Collection points Bratislava a 2642 dalších

Copyright ©2008-24 najlacnejsie-knihy.sk All rights reservedPrivacyCookies


Account: Log in
Všetky knihy sveta na jednom mieste. Navyše za skvelé ceny.

Shopping cart ( Empty )

For free shipping
shop for 59,99 € and more

You are here: